Ass-ump-tions
It is amazing the assumptions and leaps of logic people make when they read these three simple words “child-free zone”.
I must confess that this phrase was born to be cheeky, thought provoking and perhaps even a little bit confronting but it rarely means what a lot of people assume it means.
What I didn’t realise was how much baggage people bring to a subject. Some of it is passion, some of it is fear and some of it is downright ignorance.
One of the funniest responses I received when child-free zone first entered the public arena was to the logo. I person I was working with at the time looked at it and asked in all seriousness “why does that baby have blood all over it?”

Wow! I had to walk away. I couldn’t think of how to continue having a rational conversation with this person. Sure, part of our logo is red, but blood? Really? Something scary was going on in that person’s brain for sure.
One particularly venomous reaction we get that never fails to amuse me goes something like this “I’m glad you (horrible) people aren’t having kids. Imagine what terrible parents you’d be”. Yeah, well, you won’t raise my ire by agreeing with me ;-)
Another reaction, that perplexes me to this day, is “don’t you think that is a bit racist?” Of course there’s no racist connection whatsoever to the “child-free zone” words, topic or anything but yet, somehow, someone’s mind has made it.
Of course the subject itself is very broad and quite complex. You may be wondering why I’ve decided that these three words are the cause of these reactions.
Well, the reason is simple; most people who have these types of reactions have clearly not got past those three words before they go off. Rather than read a bit further or ask us a question they’ve decided, based on those three words, how they are going to react and that is that!
Only last week I had a person respond to my BLOG with the phrase “Your baby hating blog it (sic) just not cool”.
Now, Child-Free Zone always has and always will be about a person’s right to make an informed, appropriate and personal choice about reproduction. It provides the information for the other side of the choice, information which has been traditionally hard to find.
At no point does our web site proclaim or encourage the “hating of babies”. Sure, some people do feel that strongly about the subject and some people do indeed “hate babies”. But that is very clearly NOT what our web site is about. You just have to read beyond the title to discover this.
It is public knowledge that I have no interest in babies. I don’t want one, I don’t want to be around them and I don’t find them interesting but I don’t “hate them” because they are babies. Our web site, and well, me in particular, will bag adults for making stupid reproductive choices but it won’t “hate babies”. There’s no point, they can’t fix the problem. They’re the product not the cause.

I’m not the argumentative type. But when someone labels me incorrectly you won’t keep me quiet. It is not that I care about their opinion. It is that I care about their ignorance spreading to those I do care about.
I guess what this is all about is our reaction to unpalatable information. We’ll all encounter it at some time of another. It is us who choose to label it as unpalatable. It is also us who choose when to label it as unpalatable.
It is a tough ask, when our communications channels are catering to our ever shortening attention spans, but please read or listen beyond “the first three words” before you make your judgement on any subject.
I promise to do the same.
David and Susan Moore knew in their early twenties that they did not want to have children, and were lucky enough to find a like-minded partner. They met at work and were married less than twelve months later. Now they wonder how they would ever find time to be parents (even if they wanted to). Visit them at www.childfree.com.au.
- Login to post comments
- 544 reads







I know what you mean,
I know what you mean, although not in relation to babies. I am not a big pet person. I don't HATE dogs or cats, but I really dislike their smell and their fur and how they lick you (dogs especially). I didn't grow up around dogs/cats so don't really know what to do with them, and look decidedly awkward when I am around one. Dog/Cat lovers manage to translate that to a HATRED of animals which is very far from the truth. I would never hurt an animal, and any cruelty towards animals greatly upsets me.
I can certainly see the warmth and enjoyment people gain from a relationship with an animal, and have no problem with it. It's just not something I choose.
If I've learnt anything from human nature (and the internet particularly), it is that people read everything with their bias glasses on - and project their own experiences, insecurities and phobias onto whatever you're saying, often completely discolouring the context and intention!
Re: I know whta you mean
Hi Kylie,
It is a good point you raise.
Susan and I do own pets and even in our own home, when we have guests, we do our best to accomodate the fact that "not everyone likes dogs/cats".
Our dog is well behaved. She follows rules, has been trained not to pester people and stays away from the table, doesn't beg for food an so on.
We've had people over to dinner, who don't care about dogs, who have forgotten she's in the house she is that well behaved.
In other words, she's socially acceptable...or she doesn't go out in public!
In fact, the dog comes to cafes with us, on occasion, sits outside and is so well behaved Susan and I joke that she is "Dogmapolitan!"
That all raises the conceptthat well behaved animals of any age are pleasant to be around. Badly behaved animals...not so much!
I guess I'll be accused of hating animals now too after saying that
Thanks Kylie.